On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 17:44 -0700, Sean Hunt wrote: > On 06/03/11 17:06, Benjamin Caplan wrote: > > I CFJ: The Speed switch is a switch. > > > > Arguments: > > R2347/0 (Speed) fails to specify, in the words of R2162/1 (Switches), > > "[t]he type(s) of entity possessing an instance of that switch." In > > particular, this information is specified nowhere in the rules. Thus, > > the Speed fails the definition of a switch. > > > > This CFJ has been called and resolved; the Speed is not a switch and a > fix proposal is being voted on.
I retract this CFJ.
