On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Pavitra wrote: > On 06/15/2011 03:39 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > > Pavitra wrote: > > > >> The body of my shortly forthcoming public message has no effect. > > > > Pavitra wrote: > > > >> I register. > > > > Obligatory CFJ, disqualifying Pavitra: Pavitra is a player. > > > > Evidence: The messages quoted in evidence. The second was a reply > > to the first, sent about 90 seconds later. > > > > (I'll get CotC stuff caught up within the next 12 hours) > > Gratuitous evidence: CFJs 1451-1452 and 2133. > > > Gratuitous arguments: > > CFJs 1451-1452 establish that messages generally can be split into > multiple emails.
Gratuitous: CFJ 1451 includes the following qualifier: "I note that both of these were exceedingly simple cases of non-standard messages. Messages that are more complex or less clear will require testing by CFJ and may be found to lack one or more components of Hofstadter's identity of messages." I think the timing of truth values and disclaimers is in fact "more complex and less clear." For example, if disclaimers work immediately forward, it would imply they could work immediately backwards, with connotations that a "message" never leaves a technical domain of control because we'd never be able to tell if it were "finished". -G.
