?-?-? > ID: 7129 > Title: Why did we repeal that victory condition? > Author: scshunt > AI: 1.0 > Text: > > Bucky satisfies the Victory Condition of Paradox.
VICTORY ANNOUNCEMENT: Bucky has satisfied the Victory Condition of Paradox. ?-?-? CoE: This is not a factually-correct Victory Announcement about a Rules- defined Victory Condition. Proposal, 're-paradox', AI-1.7 please: If Bucky has not already been awarded the Patent Title Champion (with method 'Paradox') for the passage of Proposal 7129, then it is hereby awarded. CFJ: The text labelled in this message as a Victory Announcement is a factually-correct Victory Announcement. I bar Bucky. Arguments: Not a "rules-defined victory condition" at the time that Proposal 7129 took effect. Note that the author of R2343/3 was very very explicit at limiting victory conditions to rules-defined ones as the result of a recent scam, so the intent of this new rule text should be considered. Proposal 7129 passed before R2343/3 took effect (in Proposal 7135) and victory conditions did not have to be rules defined in R2343/2. So a likely interpretation is that the win was quite valid and a Victory Condition was achieved but no Victory Announcement is currently possible. Evidence: [The above ?-?-? delimited text, please]. Rule 2343/3 (Power=1.7) Victory Conditions [excerpt] A Victory Condition is a condition explicitly defined by the rules as a victory condition. A Victory Announcement is a published statement labeled as a Victory Announcement that states clearly that a specified person or persons have satisfied a specified and rules-defined victory condition (and explicitly and clearly states which persons and which victory condition). A Victory Announcement is self-ratifying.