?-?-?
> ID: 7129
> Title: Why did we repeal that victory condition?
> Author: scshunt
> AI: 1.0
> Text:
>
> Bucky satisfies the Victory Condition of Paradox.
VICTORY ANNOUNCEMENT: Bucky has satisfied the Victory Condition of Paradox.
?-?-?
CoE: This is not a factually-correct Victory Announcement about a Rules-
defined Victory Condition.
Proposal, 're-paradox', AI-1.7 please:
If Bucky has not already been awarded the Patent Title Champion (with
method 'Paradox') for the passage of Proposal 7129, then it is hereby
awarded.
CFJ: The text labelled in this message as a Victory Announcement is a
factually-correct Victory Announcement.
I bar Bucky.
Arguments:
Not a "rules-defined victory condition" at the time that Proposal 7129 took
effect. Note that the author of R2343/3 was very very explicit at limiting
victory conditions to rules-defined ones as the result of a recent scam, so
the intent of this new rule text should be considered.
Proposal 7129 passed before R2343/3 took effect (in Proposal 7135) and
victory conditions did not have to be rules defined in R2343/2. So a likely
interpretation is that the win was quite valid and a Victory Condition was
achieved but no Victory Announcement is currently possible.
Evidence:
[The above ?-?-? delimited text, please].
Rule 2343/3 (Power=1.7)
Victory Conditions [excerpt]
A Victory Condition is a condition explicitly defined by the
rules as a victory condition. A Victory Announcement is a
published statement labeled as a Victory Announcement that
states clearly that a specified person or persons have satisfied
a specified and rules-defined victory condition (and explicitly
and clearly states which persons and which victory condition).
A Victory Announcement is self-ratifying.
