On 13 January 2012 22:08, Pavitra <celestialcognit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 01/13/2012 04:01 PM, Arkady English wrote:
>> How about we put to the test:
>>
>> CFJ: {The statement "Amend Rule xxxx/yy" is equivalent to "Amend Rule
>> xxxx IFF its revision number is yy.}
>
> Missing trailing quote.

I withdraw the aforementioned CFJ and instead call a CFJ on:

{The statement "Amend Rule xxxx/yy" is equivalent to "Amend Rule
>> xxxx IFF its revision number is yy."}

Reply via email to