On 13 January 2012 22:08, Pavitra <celestialcognit...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/13/2012 04:01 PM, Arkady English wrote: >> How about we put to the test: >> >> CFJ: {The statement "Amend Rule xxxx/yy" is equivalent to "Amend Rule >> xxxx IFF its revision number is yy.} > > Missing trailing quote.
I withdraw the aforementioned CFJ and instead call a CFJ on: {The statement "Amend Rule xxxx/yy" is equivalent to "Amend Rule >> xxxx IFF its revision number is yy."}