On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 12:02 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: > > Gratuitous: Isn't the current Registrar's report missing a player? > > Gratuitous: It is (sorry about that), but you CoEd it a few days after > it was published (and a few minutes before Tiger's message). And the > non-arduous-ness of #1 should be sufficient for FALSE. (And Tiger may > still have been subscribed to either/both backup lists for all we know.)
Gratuitous: My point is that even if it's reasonably easy to find a player's list, it's quite the burden to determine whether it's correct. -- ais523
