The Person Formerly Known As 441344 wrote:
The rule does apply the "SHALL NOT" to the judge who "[is] assigned to
any judicial case". I judge case 3140 FALSE and case 3141 TRUE.
For each of these cases, I intend (with 2 support) to request
reconsideration of its judgement. The literal reading behind these
judgements blames the judge for something out of eir control; the
less literal reading ("the assigner of judges SHALL NOT assign judges")
avoids that problem, and is reasonably obvious to infer.
