Denied, since your CoEs said that BobTHJ was a player. I CoE each of those reports: Contrary to earlier CoEs, neither Mister Snuggles nor BobTHJ was a player, BobTHJ had no Rubles, and the Ruble Report already listed Mister Snuggles correctly under eir other name. I CoE my most recent Registrar's report: Mister Snuggles was not a player. I CoE my most recent General Secretary's report: Mister Snuggles is listed twice, under two different names, and the entry beginning "Mister Snuggles" is incorrect. I accept the CoEs I just made.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:06 PM, <com...@gmail.com> wrote: > I re-CoE these in light of Mister Snuggles' recent revelation, and because I > don't think it was ever judged whether the registration attempt would have > succeeded. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 27, 2012, at 5:46 PM, FKA441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> TTttPF >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: FKA441344 <441...@gmail.com> >> Date: Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:33 PM >> Subject: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Census >> To: agora-discuss...@agoranomic.org >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:53 AM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:12 AM, FKA441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> RUBLES >>>> PERSON RUBLES OWNED >>>> ################################## >>> >>> CoE: Does not list BobTHJ. >> >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:54 AM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:12 AM, FKA441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> FIRST-CLASS PLAYERS (19) >>> >>> CoE: This does not list BobTHJ. >> >>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 7:33 PM, FKA441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> FIRST-CLASS PLAYERS (21) >>> >>> CoE: Neither does this. >> >> For each of the above reports, I CoE: Mister Snuggles was a player, >> and had 2 rubles on Mar 19. I accept each of the CoEs I just made. >> In response to omd's CoEs, I CFJ: BobTHJ was a player on or about Mar >> 15 2012 and on or about Mar 19 2012 >> Arguments: I am initiating this CFJ because I have to either accept, >> deny, or CFJ on omd's CoEs and I do not know whether they are correct. >> I believe that this CFJ should be judged IRRELEVANT.
