On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:26 PM, FKA441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 6:42 PM, FKA441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:24 PM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I belatedly judge CFJs 3215-16 TRUE, because as I mentioned shortly >>> after they were called, there are more unusual ways to introduce >>> proposal or cause rule changes that would prevent Agora from being >>> ossified in any case. >> >> Did you mean to judge 3215 FALSE? If removing "which places the >> proposal in the Proposal Pool" wouldn't make Agora ossified, and the >> Ruleset doesn't self-ratify, I don't see why it would still be there >> when I called 3215. > > I intend to, with two support, file a motion to reconsider case 3215.
I intend to, with two support, appeal case 3215.
