On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 5:56 PM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Proposal 7435 (AI=2, Ordinary) by scshunt
> Numericity

We vote AGAINST, as the current wording is unnecessarily confusing. We
would be happy to help reword it to be both shorter and more clear.

> Proposal 7436 (AI=3, Ordinary) by scshunt
> De-persist commitments
>
> Amend Rule 2337 (Promises) by replacing "limited to persons" with
> "limited to players."

We vote FOR.


--Wes

Reply via email to