Roujo wrote:
Detail: http://cotc.psychose.ca/viewcase.php?cfj=3329========================= Criminal Case 3329 ========================= scshunt has failed to submit an IADoP's report for this week, and in doing so has violated Rule 2143. ======================================================================== Caller: scshunt Judge: Walker Judgement: GUILTY/FINE ======================================================================== History: Called by scshunt: 26 May 2013 22:47:15 GMT Defendant scshunt informed: 26 May 2013 22:47:15 GMT Assigned to Henri: 27 May 2013 22:35:18 GMT Henri recused: 09 Jun 2013 18:20:49 GMT Assigned to Wes: 09 Jun 2013 18:23:33 GMT Wes recused: 22 Jun 2013 18:59:07 GMT Assigned to Walker: 22 Jun 2013 18:59:07 GMT Judged GUILTY/FINE by Walker: 22 Jun 2013 20:45:38 GMT ======================================================================== Caller's Arguments: (I am away from home and won't get to do reports until after midnight UTC) ======================================================================== Judge Walker's Arguments: GUILTY, FINE, 1 VC. ========================================================================
I intend (with 2 support) to make this case Notable, suggesting Rule 1504 and an annotation along the lines of "GUILTY can be appropriate for inaction during a time period, even if the case was initiated while that time period was still in progress".
