On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > This may be, though, when second-class players had a Right to Participate > in the Fora, so some mechanism had to be inferred for doing so.
As I described in the caller's arguments for that CFJ, they still do: the duplicate right-to-participate clause in Rule 478 finally rears its head. Anyway, I support the appeal.
