Going through recent rule changes as rulekeepor in order to have a RCS record.
I call for judgement, barring G., on the statement: "My family's dog Lilly is a person." Arguments: H. Lilly is capable of freely originating and communicating independent thoughts such as "please throw this toy for me", "please open the door for me", and "I am so pleased to see you". Evidence: - http://theoatmeal.com/comics/dog_paradox - R869: Any organism that is generally capable of freely originating and communicating independent thoughts and ideas is a person. Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, no other entities are persons.
