I CFJ on the statement: I paid Gaelan 1 Shiney via QPS.
Arguments:
1 - QPS isn't a valid agency, as it contains 4 non-conjunction words. (Will
is a verb, not a conjunction)
2 - Agencies allow people to be acted on behalf of, not acted as (though
I'm unsure if there's a valid distinction there)
Evidence:
QPS's Supposed Text:
{{{
Quazie will Pay the Shinies (QPS)
Head: Quazie
Agents: All Players
Powers:
If Quazie makes a pledge in which e pledges 1 Shiny in return for an
action or statement, the first player to fulfil the action/statement
in the pledge can transfer a Shiny from Quazie to emself.
}}}
Agencies Rule text (in part):
{{{
Rule 2467/1 (Power=1)
Agencies
An Agency is a document empowering persons to act on behalf of
another player. A player may establish an Agency With 24 hours
Notice and thereby become its Director by specifying the
properties of the new Agency:
a) A title, which must be exactly three words, not
counting conjunctions, articles or prepositions.
}}}
Text of the pledge in question:
{{{
I pledge to pay Gaelan 1 shiny in thanks for not creating ~25^3 if he uses
the powers within the QPS agency to pay emself said shiny.
}}}
Text of the supposed payment of a shiny
{{{
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 20:25 Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
I act as Quazie via QPS to pay myself one shiny.
}}}
---END CFJ---
I retract my pledge quoted above as evidence.
I pledge that if I didn't pay Gaelan 1 Shiny via QPS, that when the above
CFJ resolves I will pay em 1 Shiny.
I CoE on the latest Secretary report that now contains the payment in
question, as it's not in question.
