On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 12:45 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > ============================== CFJ 3505 ============================== > > Can this statement have a Judge? > > ======================================================================== > > Caller: CuddleBeam > > Judge: Quazie > Judgement: TRUE > > ======================================================================== [snip] > To Summarize: Though I have judged this CFJ, I believe that I was > ineligible to be assigned to the CFJ by the reasonableness of the > barring attempt. A reasonableness that comes from the fact that the > barring itself isn't resolved until judge assignment, and all the > information was at hand at that time, and thus no unreasonable > obligations were placed on the Arbitor. > ========================================================================
I'm not sure I agree with this reasoning (although I agree with the verdict). To reduce ambiguity as to the status of this CFJ, I (attempt to) assign it to myself, then judge it TRUE. -- ais523
