"I Point My Finger at um... what's your nickname? Kerim, anyway. For clear reasons, let's see what happens though"
TTttPF On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 7:15 AM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I Point My Finger at um... what's your nickname? Kerim, anyway. For clear > reasons, let's see what happens though. > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, Quazie wrote: >> > 1 - Current rules are certainly not handled by 10 year old CFJs... BUT2 >> - A non-player >> > interacting with the game can't be compelled to act, but if they do act >> they are wilfully >> > agreeing and can be bound by the rules - meaning they can't just do >> illegal things and >> > have them succeed, as they are `playing the game` and thus must abide >> by the rules. >> >> No, "acting" in general within Agora is not a wilful agreement on the >> rules in and of >> itself. The actual players may "play the game" by adjusting records >> according to the >> rules to reflect a non-player's actions, but that doesn't mean the >> non-player has agreed >> to it. >> >> They still can't do IMPOSSIBLE things, though they could do ILLEGAL >> things and not >> be punished. >> >> Let's test it, shall we? Here's one that's written for PERSONS (Rule >> 2143): >> A person SHALL NOT publish information that is inaccurate or >> misleading while performing an official duty, or within a >> document purporting to be part of any person or office's weekly >> or monthly report. >> >> Therefore, I purport the following document is part of the Registrar's >> Weekly Report: >> >> [beginning of document] >> >> Player Contact >> Registered >> ------ ------- >> ---------- >> DoggleBoon cuddlebeam at googlemail.com 20 May >> 17 >> >> [end of document] >> >> I'll leave it to Players to decide how to resolve my above statement, >> while noting >> that I DO NOT AGREE OR CONSENT TO ABIDE OR OTHERWISE BE BOUND BY THE >> RULES. >> >> >> >> >> >> >
