I mean I support the moot. Sorry.

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I move reconsideration too.
>
> I also point my nose at VJ Rada and wiggle it for the crime of breaking
> his pledgerino.
>
> So many crimes going on lol - y'all goddamn criminals, the lot of you.
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 9:53 AM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I move reconsideration.
>>
>> I recuse myself.
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, July 6, 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> TTttPF
>>> ----
>>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > On Jul 5, 2017, at 5:16 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
>>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I move to enter this judgement into moot.
>>> > ----
>>> > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>>> > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> On Jul 5, 2017, at 4:35 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> This contains my motion to reconsider and my
>>> >> adressing your argument (although cursorily)
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:42 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> I move to reconsider (you can't, you cndan intend to move
>>> >> and wait for two support.
>>> >>
>>> >> I'm judging this FALSE. GASP! Surprise rocks the nation.
>>> >> I'm not judging it FALSE because auctioning is a regulated
>>> >> action though. It seems to me that despite the auction
>>> >> provisions, people could auction their own property
>>> >> without breaching the rules. I'm judging it based on the fact
>>> >> that Estate ownership is regulated, and CB's attempt to auction
>>> >> off Estates owned by another entity (Agora) and person (Josh)
>>> >> does not work.
>>> >>
>>> >> "A player who owns an Estate can and may transfer it to any
>>> >> player, to any Organization, or to Agora, by announcement"
>>> >> from rule 2489 regulates Estate ownership, as does the auction
>>> >> provision. This, mixed with the fact that the ordinary meaning of
>>> >> the word "Owner" means someone who can control their
>>> >> property, precludes anyone from taking an Estate from its owner
>>> >> or causing it to be taken from em, unless specifically authorized
>>> >> by rule (such as the auction provision).
>>> >>
>>> >> CB raises the additional argument that an auction still can be
>>> >> called even if the winner cannot have the property transferred
>>> >> to them. Auction is undefined. The ordinary meaning is
>>> >> "a public sale in which goods or property are sold to the highest
>>> >> bidder.". A sale cannot exist unless the property is actually
>>> >> given to the winner of the auction. I have already explained that
>>> >> this cannot happen. Therefore, an auction has not been called
>>> >> here.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> I motion to reconsider.
>>> >>
>>> >> Whether the winning bid can actually make a transfer or not shouldn't
>>> affect if there is actually an *auction* or not in the first place, I
>>> believe.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:14 AM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> I'm judging this FALSE. GASP! Surprise rocks the nation.
>>> >> I'm not judging it FALSE because auctioning is a regulated
>>> >> action though. It seems to me that despite the auction
>>> >> provisions, people could auction their own property
>>> >> without breaching the rules. I'm judging it based on the fact
>>> >> that Estate ownership is regulated, and CB's attempt to auction
>>> >> off Estates owned by another entity (Agora) and person (Josh)
>>> >> does not work.
>>> >>
>>> >> "A player who owns an Estate can and may transfer it to any
>>> >> player, to any Organization, or to Agora, by announcement"
>>> >> from rule 2489 regulates Estate ownership, as does the auction
>>> >> provision. This, mixed with the fact that the ordinary meaning of
>>> >> the word "Owner" means someone who can control their
>>> >> property, precludes anyone from taking an Estate from its owner
>>> >> or causing it to be taken from em, unless specifically authorized
>>> >> by rule (such as the auction provision).
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 12:12 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> On Sun, 2017-07-02 at 02:21 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote:
>>> >>> The moment is ripe to attempt something like this, because it's
>>> Auction
>>> >>> time. Let's go:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Putting Estates up to Auction is an unregulated action, much like
>>> >>> withdrawing. (I don't personally believe this - because I believe all
>>> >>> actions in the universe are Regulated - but many others do, so I'm
>>> going
>>> >>> off that). In case its of doubt, the following states an obligation
>>> for the
>>> >>> Surveyor to perform, so its not a description of "circumstances
>>> under which
>>> >>> the action would succeed or fail":
>>> >>>
>>> >>> "At the start of each month, if Agora owns at least one Estate, the
>>> >>> Surveyor shall put one Estate which is owned by Agora up for
>>> auction, by
>>> >>> announcement. Each auction ends seven days after it begins."
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Additionally, the state of being in an auction or not is tracked by
>>> nobody,
>>> >>> so it doesn't infringe "would, as part of its effect, modify
>>> information
>>> >>> for which some player is required to be a recordkeepor"
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Therefore:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> - I put every Estate up for Auction, (even those owned by other
>>> players, if
>>> >>> possible).
>>> >>> - I then bid a million shinies on each of them.
>>> >>> - I then bid one shiny on each of them.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I have absolutely no defense towards other people bidding more than a
>>> >>> million and using my own "scam" to win auctions, which only works
>>> versus
>>> >>> the "conventional" way of winning them by bidding amounts of cash you
>>> >>> actually own.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I CFJ: "There is currently more than one auction for Estates"
>>> >>>
>>> >>> That's all.
>>> >>
>>> >> This is CFJ 3537. I assign it to V.J. Rada.
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> ais523
>>> >> Arbitor
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to