On Sun, 2017-07-09 at 18:10 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > I object on the same grounds. Please, just try to ignore em. Also, > you deregister by announcement, so your intent is ineffective.
Agreed with respect to "don't let one player get you down if the rest of the game is enjoyable". So on that basis, I object. In terms of the "you can't deregister without objection", we used to have an "induction" rule that let you do actions via a "more difficult" method of the intended method (e.g. if an action could be taken by announcement, it could be taken with support or without objection instead). That rule's been repealed since (I think it was added in the hope it would lead to interesting scams; IIRC it was used a couple of times). That said, remember that the dependent action system is "backwards" (intents don't do anything at all by themselves, but resolutions fail unless there's a matching intent), so you can announce intent to do anything you like without breaking the rules, and in this case, it looked like it was a normal English definition of intention. -- ais523
