On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 6:39 PM Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: > > On Sun, 2017-08-13 at 20:15 -0500, grok (caleb vines) wrote: > > CoE grok is a player > > If only we could set up a standing order for this or something. > The Referee should perhaps at least start giving out cards; a mistake > in a report is excusable, making it that many times in a row isn't. > > -- > ais523
I point my finger at P.S.S. for violations of Rule 2143, which states that: "A person SHALL NOT publish information that is inaccurate or misleading while performing an official duty, or within a document purporting to be part of any person or office's weekly or monthly report." I recommend a sentence of yellow card. These errors, while independently insignificant, together have a "a significant, though small, impact on gameplay" (Rule 2427), if nothing else because they're an annoying distraction. I AP-CFJ "The most recent document, published to agora-official, and purporting to be the Registrar's report, was not in fact a report." Caller's arguments: CFJ 2392 makes it clear that deliberately inaccurate reports are not reports. CFJ 3462 (which I judged) extended this to apply to reports that "exhibit gross sloppiness and negligence, equivalent in severity to lying in the report or not publishing it." That's a rather high bar to meet, but I believe this situation qualifies. Here, repeated CoEs and a-d discussion, some of which involved P.S.S. emself, have discussed the situation. It is matter well supported by the public record that this error has occurred numerous times (see for example [1], [2]). Under circumstances, I believe the CFJ 3462 standard is met. To be clear, this CFJ raises a Rule 2201 doubt regarding the report. I CoE P.S.S.'s attempt to claim a reward for the report on the basis that there was no report. [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg29024.html [2] https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg28918.html -Aris
