I withdraw it; I had some revisions to do and it isn't ready.

On Sun, Oct 15, 2017, 18:27 Aris Merchant, <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I pend this for 1 shiny.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This is just a miscellaneous fix proposal:
> >
> > Proposal: High Power Cleanup (AI=3)
> > {{{
> > Text in square brackets is not a substantive part of this proposal and is
> > ignored when it takes effect.
> >
> > Amend Rule 105, bullet 2 to read "When a rule is repealed, it ceases to
> be a
> > rule, its power is set to 0, and the Rulekeepor need no longer maintain a
> > record of it."
> >
> > [There is a ruling that repealed rules have their power set to 0, but I'm
> > not sure I fully agree with that conclusion; this makes it explicit which
> > can't hurt anyway.]
> >
> > Set the power of all entities other than Rules, Regulations, and this
> > Proposal to 0.
> >
> > [This is a general cleanup that catches repealed rules and other
> entities. I
> > believe that this actuall depowers old proposals, but that's probably a
> good
> > thing to be quite honest.]
> >
> > Amend Rule 105, bullet 3 by appending "Unless specified otherwise by the
> > re-enacting instrument, a re-enacted rule has power equal to the power it
> > had at the time of its repeal (or power 1, if power was not deifned at
> the
> > time of that rule's repeal). If the re-enacting instrument is incapable
> of
> > setting the re-enacted rule's power to that value, then the re-enactment
> is
> > null and void."
> >
> > [Re-enactment currently doesn't have a specified power; this causes it to
> > work roughly the way you would expect it to.]
> >
> > Amend Rule 1023 by appending "The same applies, mutatis mutandis, to for
> > determining whether two points in time are within N months of each other,
> > for N greater than or equal to 2." as a new paragraph in the fourth
> bullet
> > in the first list.
> >
> > [This makes the logical extension to "within 6 months", which is used,
> > explicit.]
> > }}}
> >
> > -Alexis
>

Reply via email to