I become a participant in the Order of the Occult Hand.
On 10/26/2017 09:34 PM, Josh T wrote: > For the purposes to provide everyone involved with a fun game, I would > like to ask those interested to partake in a voluntary anonymous > survey so I have an idea of what people are expecting. I will probably > be making word/phrase lists on Saturday after I resolve my intent to > amend the contract so that it is usable and pull / update that list as > people make or concede the wager. The survey can be found > here: > https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf1aKvKLkD-kzBPrgBJaRyl32nA028tjNlZXNCKvu35Vw5E8Q/viewform > > > 天火狐 > > On 26 October 2017 at 00:25, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com > <mailto:vijar...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I become a party to the Order > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Josh T > <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com <mailto:draconicdarkn...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > NttPF. > > > > I posted the intent to amend. I'm heading to bed though, so if I > missed > > things let me know and I'll amend to fix it ASAP. > > > > 天火狐 > > > > On 26 October 2017 at 00:19, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com > <mailto:vijar...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > >> I become a party to the Order. > >> > >> I will wager if you change the party/participant thing. > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com > <mailto:nich...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > I become a party of Order of the Occult Hand. I like the idea > >> > tremendously but there's two qualms: > >> > > >> > * Party and participant are used interchangeably when they > are in fact > >> > not. Party includes the proprietor, participant does not. > This leads, > >> > either intentionally or accidentally, to the bigger issue: > >> > > >> > * The proprietor appears to be able to look for the occult hand, > >> > potentially making this a giant scam. > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> From V.J. Rada > > > > > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
