On Mon, 2017-10-30 at 13:28 +1100, Telnaior wrote: > Following the precedent that will hopefully be set in CFJ**3587, it is > clear that parties to the contract 'Judicial Activism: the Contract' are > bound to act within the best interests of the game. I believe that lying > to fellow law-abiding players, even in the discussion forum, is contrary > to these interests and is therefore forbidden.
Gratuitous argument: I believe that requiring players to pay significant amounts of real money is not in the interests of the game either, so some balance will need to be found. -- ais523
