EOS does create the obligation to pay you half of my shinies. I suppose that might create the pink slip "personal gain" that might make trouble, but an obligation is an obligation. I pay o. 11 shinies.
I pledge that, if any fingers are pointed over o's attempt to buy me an estate, I will not personally decide whether or not to issue a card. While the Arbitor is not currently empowered by the rules to take over the investigation, I feel it would be much more appropriate in this circumstance to informally ask the Arbitor to recommend a card, and then impose that card unconditionally. If the Arbitor will not, I'm sure another impartial observer (or the CFJ process) will. On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > I intend, without objection, to destroy the contract "Easy Off Scam: Cleaning > Your Mold Fast”. > > I intend, without objection, to destroy the contract “Scam Fix”. > > In both cases, I feel this is appropriate - neither contract provides for its > own dissolution or amendment, so there is no obvious other way to clean these > up before December. Both have served their nominal purposes, and I’d prefer > if they weren’t left lying around to cause further trouble. > > -o > -- >From V.J. Rada
