I support, with the following arguments:

One reason the judge gives for judging as e does is that the case has
been rendered moot by a rule change.  This is not always a bad choice,
but forgets that it's not moot for the Herald-initiated Agoran decision
that may or may not be ongoing.


On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> I don't understand 3594 either. I intend to call a motion for
> reconsideration with two support on the grounds that 1: the judgement
> seemed to consider best interests of the game using facts after the calling
> of the CFJ, rather than the best interests of the game with each blanket
> interpretation of the rules and 2: the judgement appeared to invalidate a
> rules clause for the best interests of the game, which is obviously not
> possible.
> 
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > ========================================================================
> > COURT GAZETTE [Arbitor's Weekly Report for 19 Nov 2017]
> >
> > *  PUBLIC REMINDER to PSS, G., and Aris
> >    You have judgements that are late or nearly late!  See below.
> >
> > *  I've dropped Nichdel from the list of judges as e hasn't been around.
> >    Can re-add at request!
> >
> > Open Cases (CFJs)
> > ------------------------
> > [* = overdue, ! = <24 hours before deadline]
> >
> > 3591* Motioned to Publius  (due Sat, 18 Nov 2017 ~03:14:10)
> > 3595! Assigned to G.       (due Sun, 19 Nov 2017 ~22:14:02)
> > 3596! Assigned to G.       (due Sun, 19 Nov 2017 ~22:16:00)
> > 3597! Assigned to Aris     (due Sun, 19 Nov 2017 ~22:19:51)
> >
> > 3598  Assigned to ATMunn   (due Sun, 26 Nov 2017 ~19:56:44)
> > 3599  Assigned to o        (due Sun, 26 Nov 2017 ~20:01:43)
> > 3600  Assigned to o        (due Sun, 26 Nov 2017 ~20:01:43)
> > 3601  Assigned to o        (due Sun, 26 Nov 2017 ~20:01:43)
> > 3602  Assigned to Telnaior (due Sun, 26 Nov 2017 ~20:03:30)
> > 3603  Assigned to Alexis   (due Sun, 26 Nov 2017 ~20:07:06)
> > 3604  Assigned to Alexis   (due Sun, 26 Nov 2017 ~20:09:22)
> >
> >
> > Recently-Delivered Verdicts and Implications
> > --------------------------------------------
> > [** = consider for rules annotation, ! = delivered late]
> >
> > **3592 by o:  If a purported report is missing required information, it
> > is not a report.
> >
> > 3593 by ATMunn:  a collection of puns without a final punchline can be
> > "a truly hideous pun" as per R1650.
> >
> > 3594 bt Telnaior:  confusion in Medal of Honour definition ("month" and
> > "7 days") somehow made the rule not work (a bit confused on the logic of
> > the judge's arguments myself).
> >
> >
> > Bench Roster
> >
> > Judge      Court[***]   Recent
> > -----      -----        ------
> > G.         Night        3556, 3567, 3563, 3579, 3580, 3582, 3595, 3596
> > Publius    Night        3558, 3561, 3574, 3576, 3591
> > Corona     Night
> > o          Day          3568, 3565, 3572, 3584, 3590, 3592, 3599-3601
> > Aris       Day          3557, 3562, 3577, 3578, 3589, 3597
> > V.J. Rada  Day          3585
> > Telnaior   Day          3586, 3594, 3602
> > Alexis     Weekend      3573, 3581, 3587, 3588, 3603, 3604
> > ATMunn     Weekend      3593, 3598
> >
> >
> > Highest Numbered Case:   3604
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [***] Court Descriptions
> >
> > Day Court   [Default, rotate roster through as needed].
> >
> > Night Court [Assigned quick turnaround cases (either trivial or
> >              game-urgent), generally promises to judge in 4 days].
> >
> > Weekend Court [Backup/partial rotation, generally gets half as many
> >                cases each as Day Court].
> >
> > Courts are informal relative levels of "interest" in judging as per
> > R991.  Players can change Court by notifying the Arbitor.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > DISCLAIMER
> >       Informational only - No actions are contained in this report.
> >       Information in this report is NOT self-ratifying.
> >
> > ========================================================================
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> From V.J. Rada
>

Reply via email to