I call a CFJ with the statement "If an Agoran Decision were now initiated, the quorum would be 8".
The official Assessment recently published listed 9 voters on the most recent proposal, which would make the quorum 7. However, I contended that I used PSS to vote FOR that proposal. The language I used was "I also have PSS vote as I do".The question is whether that language runs afoul of rule 2466 which institutes a "requirement that the agent must, in the message in which the action is performed, uniquely identify the principal and that the action is being taken on behalf of that person. -- >From V.J. Rada
