I CFJ: My conditional vote in the appended message evaluates to FOR each proposal.
Caller's arguments: while this contains a conditional referring a hypothetical future situation, that situation is not indeterminate, as I specified "in the next instant, before any other process regulated by the ruleset of Agora takes place", meaning it can be unambiguously logically derived from the present situation (that is, the present situation - my first message and the withdrawal + my second message = the hypothetical future situation). ~Corona On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 6:35 PM, Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> wrote: > I withdraw my vote on these proposals. > > I vote on these proposals in such a manner that, in a hypothetical > alternate gamestate identical to the current one except for me never > sending the message immediately before this one, and this message not > containing the withdrawal of my earlier vote, in case that in the next > instant, before any other process regulated by the ruleset of Agora takes > place, a player would respond to this thread with the message "I do the > same as the last six people in this thread", their vote on all of these > proposals would evaluate to FOR all of the aforementioned proposals. > > (oops, I killed the joke, if any existed in the first place) > > > ~Corona > > On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 6:03 PM, Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I vote on these proposals in such a manner that, in case that in the next >> instant, before any other process regulated by the ruleset of Agora takes >> place, a player will respond to this thread with the message "I do the >> same as the last six people in this thread", their vote on all of these >> proposals will be valid. >> >> ~Corona >> >> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 5:17 PM, Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I do the same as the last four people in this thread. >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018, 09:09 ATMunn <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > I do the same as the last three people in this thread. >>> > >>> > On 6/23/2018 6:14 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: >>> > > I also vote FOR proposals 8053-8057. >>> > > >>> > > -twg >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>> > > >>> > > On June 23, 2018 8:41 AM, Ned Strange <edwardostra...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> I vote FOR each listed proposal >>> > >> >>> > >> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 4:04 PM, Aris Merchant >>> > >> >>> > >> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >>> I vote as follows: >>> > >>> >>> > >>>> ID Author(s) AI Title Pender >>> > >>>> ---------------------------- >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> 8053* G., Aris 1.0 patch patch patch G. [1] >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> FOR >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> 8054+ Aris, [2] 3.0 Minimalist Contracts v2 Aris >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> FOR >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> 8055+ Aris, G. 3.0 Distributed Assets v3 Aris >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> FOR >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> 8056+ Aris, G. 3.0 Deregulation Act v2 Aris >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> FOR >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> 8057* Corona 1.0 No quorum, no medal Corona [1] >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> FOR >>> > >>> >>> > >>> -Aris >>> > >> >>> > >> -- >>> > >> >>> > >> From V.J. Rada >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >> >> >
