Sigh. Unfortunately, this is a substantive difference. I distributed (or rather, attempted to distribute) a proposal that didn't exist, rather than one that did where I made an error as to some detail. It's almost certainly invalid, and I'm going to have to distribute it again. Sorry for the mess. I deny your CoE, because I didn't actually distribute anything, and CoE my proposal pool report for missing the stated proposal.
-Aris On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:50 PM Reuben Staley <[email protected]> wrote: > > CoE: 8086 should be the most recent version of the proposal, 3.2. > > I withdrew 3.1 and submitted 3.2 in this message: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg32499.html > > I don't think this will change many peoples' votes. > > That being said, I vote as follows: > > On 08/12/2018 12:52 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: > > ID Author(s) AI Title > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > 8077A! twg 3.0 Patchy McPatchface > PRESENT > > 8078A! twg 2.0 From each according to eir means > AGAINST > > 8079A! twg 2.0 From each according to eir means v2 > FOR > > 8080A! Aris, twg 2.0 From each according to eir means v3 > AGAINST > > 8081A! Aris, G., twg 3.0 Point Installation Act v2 > FOR > > 8082! twg 1.0 Gamestate correction for July 2018 > FOR > > 8083! G. 3.0 quorum fixes > FOR > > 8084! Trigon 1.0 Needs more Competition > FOR > > 8085! Kenyon, twg 1.0 Plain Old Bribery, Mk. II > PRESENT > > 8086! Trigon, [1] 1.0 Revamping movement v3.1 > FOR > > 8087! Aris 1.0 Even Freer Proposals v2 > AGAINST > > 8088! Kenyon, twg 1.0 Return of the Zombie Loopholes > FOR > > -- > Trigon
