I agree with this analysis. I self move to reconsider 3745, and judge it FALSE for the reasons given by g.
> On Jul 1, 2019, at 12:30 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: > > The Proposal Distribution (not the Proposal) was CoE'd on the AI (the > Distribution listed the AI as 0.5, which is wrong regardless). Since AI is > an essential parameter, that means the attempt to distribute the proposal > and create a decision failed, by R107. (using R107 language, the CoE > "correctly identified the lack" of a valid AI). > > Therefore the decision was never initiated - it was invalid. (This > all happened before the CFJs were called).
