I earn: 5 coins for the 12-Jan-20 Assessor's Weekly Report. 5 coins for the 12-Jan-20 Herald's Weekly Report. 5 coins for the judgement of CFJ 3792. 5 coins for the judgement of CFJ 3790.
I earn 12 coins for earning a blue ribbon for CFJ 3790. I earn 12 coins for earning a blue ribbon for CFJ 3792. I CFJ: G. earned 12 coins for earning a blue ribbon for CFJ 3792. Arguments: I judged CFJ 3792 five days ago (earning a blue ribbon), and then I judged CFJ 3790 today (earning another blue ribbon). R2602 reads: > If a player has earned a ribbon in the past 7 days but already > owned it e CAN once (until e earns another ribbon), by > announcement, earn N+1 coins where N is the number of current > players that do not own the same ribbon. The "once (until e earns another ribbon)" is there, I believe, such that a person can't get multiple rewards for the same judgement. However, it also reads (unintentionally?) as a limit. If the parenthetical is read like this: "CAN once (until e earns another ribbon)", then the "until" effects the "CAN", not the "once" and prevents earnings from a previous ribbon after a new ribbon is earned. This seems like a more natural reading to me (applying the limitation to the verb). Evidence (from the actions above): G. wrote: > I earn 12 coins for earning a blue ribbon for CFJ 3790. > I earn 12 coins for earning a blue ribbon for CFJ 3792.
