On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 9:11 AM Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business <[email protected]> wrote: > CFJ, barring Alexis: "I published a Referee report today." > > This CFJ is extremely similar to CFJ 3792, except without the > technicality that caused it to be judged FALSE. I request it be assigned > to the same judge.
Since that judge was me, a comment. There are actually two questions. (1) Was is a report satisfying the requirement to publish all information once per week, and (2) what was the actual, effective date of the report (the backdate listed, or the datestamp on the message?) >From what I said last time, my judgement would be that (1) is fairly trivial - it is a report, because regardless of how we treat the date stamp, it's either (a) correct, or (b) a fairly trivial error well within the sorts of error we accept in a report. So you might want to ask question (2) which is the real meat of the matter - I won't ask it in case you still want me to judge them both. Also, I CoE the blot listings in the below-indicated report: it is missing at least 1 person with a blot. (how to resolve the CoE relies on the answer to question 2). > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The Police Blotter (Referee's Weekly Report) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This report: > Published: 2020-01-24 > Accurate as of: 2020-01-20 00:00
