On 8/28/20 2:20 PM, nix via agora-business wrote: > On 8/28/20 1:09 PM, nix via agora-business wrote: >> On 8/28/20 11:17 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: >>> I submit the following proposal, "Minor Adjustments", AI-3: >>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Increase the power of Rule 2633 (Rulebending) to 3. >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> I issue the cabinet order Manifesto, distributing the above proposal. (I >> don't think I can assign it an ID, the Promotor has to I believe). The >> valid votes are FOR, AGAINST, PRESENT, as well as conditional votes. The >> assessor is the vote collector on this decision. >> >> -- >> nix >> Prime Minister, Webmastor >> > If this failed because I forgot some essential parameters then I do the > following: > > I issue the cabinet order Manifesto, distributing the above proposal. (I > don't think I can assign it an ID, the Promotor has to I believe). For this > decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the voting method is > AI-majority, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a > valid vote, as are conditional votes). The author is G., the AI is 3. There > are no co-authors, the class is democratic. > > Sorry about the messy distribution, I missed the essential parameters > requirement when I was checking the rules. >
Assessorial opinion: The first distribution is INEFFECTIVE due to failure to specify class. The second distribution is EFFECTIVE. -- Jason Cobb
