I vote FOR on the referendum for the below proposal. I cause Baron von Vanderham to vote to ENDORSE me on the referendum for the below proposal.
On 11/1/20 9:12 PM, ATMunn via agora-official wrote: > I submit the following proposal: > > Title: Theftn't > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: ATMunn > Co-author: Jason > Chamber: Compliance > > -- START OF PROPOSAL TEXT -- > > Amend Rule 2531 to read, in whole: > { > > Any attempt to levy a fine is INEFFECTIVE if it does not include value > of the fine in blots, the name of the person being fined (the perp), and > the specific reason for the fine. > > Any attempt to levy a fine pursuant to the imposition of the Cold Hand > of Justice is INEFFECTIVE if: > > (1) it attempts to levy a fine on a person when that person can't be > established by a preponderance of the evidence to have committed the > action or inaction for which the fine was levied; > > (2) it attempts to levy a fine for an action or inaction which, at the > time the inaction or action occurred, was not prohibited by the rules; > > (3) it attempts to levy a fine on a person for failure to take an > action that e, through no fault of eir own, COULD NOT have performed; > > (4) it attempts to levy a fine on a person for conduct that e, through > no fault of eir own, was obliged to undertake by a rule of equal or > greater power to the one e violated; > > (5) it attempts to levy a fine on a person taking an action or inaction > e could not have avoided when exercising the highest reasonably possible > standard of care; > > (6) it attempts to levy a fine with a value that is blatantly and > obviously unsuited to the conduct which constitutes the reason for its > levy or to the person on whom it is being levied; > > (7) it attempts to levy a fine based upon the investigation of of a > Finger that had been Pointed more than 14 days after the action > constituting the reason for the fine; > > (8) it attempts to levy a fine on a player for failing to take an > action within the time period set by the Rules and that time period had > expired more than 14 days prior to the Pointed Finger, if the fine is > imposed based on an investigation of such Finger; > > (9) it attempts to levy a fine on a player who has already been fined > for the conduct constituting the reason for the levy; or > > (10) it attempts to levy a fine on a zombie for an action that its > master performed on its behalf. > > } > > -- END OF PROPOSAL TEXT -- > > > As Prime Minister, I hereby issue the Cabinet Order of Manifesto in > order to distribute the above proposal, initiating a referendum on it, > and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote > collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 9, the voting method is AI- > majority, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a > valid vote, as are conditional votes). -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor