9 aug. 2021 02:01:06 Aspen via agora-business
<agora-business@agoranomic.org>:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 4:59 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business
<agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
On 8/8/2021 3:33 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
The rules actually say "clearly specify" at one other point (Rule
107,
Initiating Agoran Decisions). In this case, while "exactly which part
of
this message constitutes the text of the intended proposal" is
somewhat
unclear, it isn't substantially unclear; any reasonable
interpretation
still leads to a proposal that,
I intend to motion to reconsider this judgement with 2 support.
In this judgement, the judge is (1) claiming the text is clearly
specified, but (2) then says it's somewhat unclear, but then (3) says
any
reasonable interpretation works, but (4) then doesn't actually give an
interpretation, that's not clarifying at all (in direct contradiction
to
the stated judgement).
Regardless of the fact that multiple interpretations might lead to a
proposal that gives the same result, that does not make a single text
clear, and a single text is required. If "any reasonable"
interpretation
is possible, then there's no clear single interpretation, which the
rule
requires.
-G.
I strongly support and do so.
-The Promotor, who likes knowing what e supposed to put in eir reports
I will wait for the final judgement of CFJ 3922 or August 16th, which
ever comes first, before taking the next action.
--
D. Wet
www.nomica.nl
