On Sun, 2023-06-04 at 20:02 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote: > CoE on the resolution of Proposal 8989: ais523 voted AGAINST, as e > had at least one rice. > > I respond to the above CoE by referencing CFJ 4034.
CFJ: At the time the Assessor first attempted to resolve the Agoran decision about whether to adopt proposal 8989, ais523's vote on that proposal resolved to PRESENT. Arguments: Rule 2127 requires a conditional vote to be "determinate" in order to avoid evaluating to PRESENT. Rule 2518 requires a value to be reasonably determinable from information reasonably available to be determinate. Were my rice holdings actually determinate at this point? There has been mass confusion (and several CFJs) regarding how the rice rules actually work, with at least two CFJs unresolved at the time of the attempted resolution. The Ricemastor is inactive, and has missed reports. Some people have taken to attempting to sign Rice Plans using lots of different wordings in the same message, in the apparent hope that at least one of them will work. Further evidence is that the Assessor appeared to be in sufficient doubt about my Rice holdings that e immediately CoEd eir own resolution, referring the situation to CFJ – this implies that it was unreasonable for em to determine my Rice holding, otherwise e would probably have done so. (In general, it seems that although it's reasonable to tie a report to a CFJ outcome, it is unreasonable to do the same for a conditional vote.) -- ais523
