I vote as so: > 9035~ snail, 4st 2.0 Unbreaking Motions FOR
> 9036* Janet, ais523 3.0 AI security revisted PRESENT, don't understand what it's about > 9037~ Murphy 2.0 Uncrossed arms FOR > 9038~ Murphy 1.0 Ratify the Ruleset Week AGAINST, not sure why we'd need this > 9039~ juan 1.0 Well, worth a shot AGAINST, lol On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 11:50 PM secretsnail9 via agora-official < agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW > > If you vote on a proposal, please edit this spreadsheet with your votes: > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F39OHtBlZlQ8XVccqKCFtP-DPuHz4wPnujxbxkCN3LI/edit?usp=sharing > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it, > and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote > collector > is the Assessor, the quorum is 6, the voting method is AI-majority, and the > valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are > conditional votes). > > > ID Author(s) AI Title > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 9035~ snail, 4st 2.0 Unbreaking Motions > 9036* Janet, ais523 3.0 AI security revisted > 9037~ Murphy 2.0 Uncrossed arms > 9038~ Murphy 1.0 Ratify the Ruleset Week > 9039~ juan 1.0 Well, worth a shot > > > > > > > The proposal pool contains the following proposals: > > ID Author(s) AI Title > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > Legend: <ID>* : Democratic proposal. > <ID>~ : Ordinary proposal. > > The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where > the information shown below differs from the information shown above, > the information shown above shall control. > > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 9035 > Title: Unbreaking Motions > Adoption Index: 2.0 > Author: snail > Co-authors: 4st > > > Change the power of Rule 2463 ("Motion of No Confidence") to 2. > [Offices are secured, so you can't actually remove the PM in this way > currently.] > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 9036 > Title: AI security revisited > Adoption Index: 3.0 > Author: Janet > Co-authors: ais523 > > > Amend R1607 by replacing "A referendum is the Agoran decision to > determine whether to adopt a proposal." with "A referendum is the Agoran > decision to determine whether to adopt a proposal (its associated > proposal)." > > [Define this undefined term.] > > > Amend Rule 1950 by, as a single amendment: > > { > > Deleting "If a referendum has an adoption index less than the adoption > index of its associated proposal, the referendum's adoption index is > immediately set to that of the associated proposal". > > Then, inserting the following paragraph after the first paragraph: > > { > > The adoption index of a referendum CANNOT be set or changed to "none" or > to a value less than that of its associated proposal. If a referendum > ever has an adoption index of "none" or an adoption index less than that > of its associated proposal, it is immediately set to the adoption index > of the associated proposal. > > } > > } > > [Prevent a low-powered rule from attempting to continuously set the > value of an AI, causing it to perhaps become indeterminate.] > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 9037 > Title: Uncrossed arms > Adoption Index: 2.0 > Author: Murphy > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 2642 (Gathering Stones) by replacing this text: > > At the beginning of each week, the stone specified by the player > with the highest Modified Rockiness that reached for a stone in > the previous week is transferred to em. In a tie, the stone > specified by the tied player who reached first is transferred to > em. When a player receives a stone in this way, eir Base Rockiness > is set to 0. > > with this text: > > At the beginning of each week, each stone owned by Agora is > transferred to the player (if any) with the highest Modified > Rockiness that reached for that stone in the previous week, > with ties broken in favor of the tied player who reached for > that stone first. When a player receives a stone in this way, > eir Base Rockiness is set to 0. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 9038 > Title: Ratify the Ruleset Week > Adoption Index: 1.0 > Author: Murphy > Co-authors: > > > Create a rule titled "Ratify the Ruleset Week" with this text: > > The Agoran week each year containing the Ides of March is Ratify > the Ruleset Week. During Ratify the Ruleset Week, the Rulekeepor > SHALL submit a proposal to ratify a purported ruleset published > since the last time the ruleset was ratified. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 9039 > Title: Well, worth a shot > Adoption Index: 1.0 > Author: juan > Co-authors: > > > Create a rule with title “We win”, power 1, and text: > { > Immediatly after the creation of this rule, the players > 4st, juan, zipzap, Goren, crystalizedmire, cuddlybanana, > Anneke-Constantine and kiako win the game and this rule > is repealed, in that order. > } > > Grant players 4st, juan, zipzap, Goren, crystalizedmire, > cuddlybanana, Anneke-Constantine and kiako Black Ribbons. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > -- > snail >
