On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 10:17 AM Trigon via agora-business <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11/3/25 9:42 AM, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote: > > On 11/3/25 11:02, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-official wrote: > >> EarlyRetirement judged CFJ 4125 a little over a week ago [1], but > >> several other people presented additional arguments after the fact, both > >> in support of the original judgement [2,3] and against it [4,5,6]. At > >> least two of these requested a Motion for Reconsideration [4,6], but the > >> deadline to file one has now passed. > >> > >> Whether or not the original judgement stands, I contend it would be > >> beneficial - to public confidence in the judicial system; to future > >> judges who must investigate precedent; and to nomic recordkeepors and > >> historians - for the case's judgement to be amended to consider these > >> additional arguments. Thus, I intend, with 3 support, to enter the > >> judgement of CFJ 4125 into Moot. > >> > >> ~qenya > > > > > > I support. > > > > I support as well, but only because moots are cool and don't get called > enough. I found the original judgement more than sufficient and I plan > to vote AFFIRM on the Agoran Decision. > > -- > Trigon > Popular Polygon
I support entering CFJ 4125 into moot. Trigon has that amazing point about moots, otherwise, this would be pointless bureaucracy! -- 4ˢᵗ wearing Jester's Cap Uncertified Bad Idea Generator
