On 03/11/2025 17:41, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
On 11/3/25 09:52, Cosmo via agora-business wrote:
Also replaced "Any person CAN" with "Any player CAN". Unless there's some
obscure bug non-players don't really need to be able do issue doubts.]
A non-player might reasonably want to doubt e.g. a Registrar's report.
and, more generally, we've had accidental deregistrations in the past;
we generally allow non-players to take actions that might help determine
or fix that status (e.g. calling CFJs).
I withdraw the proposal quoted above and submit the following one:
paragraph swap (AI=3)
{{{
Amend Rule 2201 ("Self-Ratification") by replacing
{
Any person CAN by announcement issue a doubt (syn. claim of
error), identifying a public document published less than 180 days
ago and explaining the scope and nature of a perceived error in it
(or in a statement it attests to).
The definition of documents as self-ratifying and the definition
of documents as self-ratifying attestations are secured at power
3.
}
with
{
The definition of documents as self-ratifying and the definition
of documents as self-ratifying attestations are secured at power
3.
Any person CAN by announcement issue a doubt (syn. claim of
error), identifying a public document published less than 180 days
ago and explaining the scope and nature of a perceived error in it
(or in a statement it attests to).
}
[The last paragraph begins with "When this happens, ...", which due to
the current order of the paragraphs makes it sound like the actions
described in it need to be done when the definitions are secured, not
when a doubt is issued.]
}}}
--
Cosmo
Promotor
