On 5/5/26 17:15:51, Cosmo via agora-official wrote:
=================
PROMOTOR'S REPORT
=================
I initiate a referendum on each of the following proposals, removing
them from the proposal pool. For each referendum the vote collector is
the
Assessor, the quorum is 5, the adoption index is that of the associated
proposal, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid options are FOR
and AGAINST. (PRESENT and conditional votes are also both valid votes.)
ID Author AI Name
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
9338* Galle 3.0 Claim of Error Withdrawal
9339~ Nilrem+ 2.2 Unbearable Confusion
9340* Galle 3.0 Simultaneous Rule Changes Fix
9341* Murphy 3.0 Alternative simultaneous rule changes
v1.1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposal pool contains the following proposals (self-ratifying):
Author AI Name
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
Legend:
NNNN*: Democratic proposal
NNNN~: Ordinary proposal
NAME+: Coauthors listed below
The full text of all above mentioned proposals is listed below. Where
the information shown below differs from the information shown above,
the information shown above shall control.
==========
ID 9338
Claim of Error Withdrawal (AI=3.0)
author: Galle
coauthors:
Amend Rule 2201, "Self-Ratification", by inserting the following
paragraph immediately before the final paragraph:
---
As long as the publisher of the original document has not yet
responded in any of the above ways, the issuer of a doubt CAN, by
announcement, withdraw the doubt, causing it to cease to be a doubt.
The above notwithstanding, the publisher of the original document NEED
NOT respond to a withdrawn doubt.
---
==========
ID 9339
Unbearable Confusion (AI=2.2)
author: Nilrem
coauthors: ais523
Create a new Rule with power 2.2 Titled "Temporary Helper" with the
following text:
This rule takes priority over rule 2618.
The text of a promise CAN be altered after it was created by
proposals with Adoption Index 2.2 or greater.
For each existing promise, modify its text by replacing all instances of
the phrase "the bearer" with the phrase "the casher".
Repeal the Rule titled "Temporary Helper".
Modify Rule 2618 by replacing the following text:
In a promise's text, "the bearer" and "the casher" (or the like)
both refer to the player who cashed the promise, and "this
promise" (or the like) refers to the promise. The text of the
promise can refer to the context of the message in which it is
cashed, but the context of the message does not otherwise change
the meaning of the promise.
With this text:
In a promise's text, "this promise" (or the like) refers to the
promise. The text of the promise can refer to the context of the
message in which it is cashed, but the context of the message does
not otherwise change the meaning of the promise.
==========
ID 9340
Simultaneous Rule Changes Fix (AI=3.0)
author: Galle
coauthors:
Amend Rule 105 ("Rule Changes") by replacing the following text:
---
A rule change is any effect that falls into the above classes. Rule
changes always occur sequentially, never simultaneously. If a
specification would ever be interpreted as causing multiple changes to
happen at once, it is instead interpreted as attempting to cause them
to occur separately, in the order they are listed in the specification.
---
With the following text:
---
A rule change is any effect that falls into the above classes. Rule
changes always occur sequentially, never simultaneously. If a
specification would ever be interpreted as causing multiple changes to
happen at once, it is instead interpreted as attempting to cause them
to occur separately, in the order they are listed in the
specification. If no such order can be inferred, then the specified
rule changes are void and without effect.
---
==========
ID 9341
Alternative simultaneous rule changes v1.1 (AI=3.0)
author: Murphy
coauthors:
Amend Rule 105 (Rule Changes) by replacing the paragraph containing "A
rule change is any effect that falls into the above classes." with:
A rule change is any effect that falls into the above classes.
Rule changes always occur sequentially, never simultaneously. If a
specification would ever be interpreted as causing multiple
changes to happen at once, it is instead interpreted as attempting
to cause them to occur separately, in the order they are listed in
the specification; or, if no such order is specified, and choosing
one order over another would not make a substantive difference to
the gamestate, then in order of increasing rule number (ties
broken by when the rules were created, earliest to latest).
[Explicitly allows proposals like "Amend all rules containing X by
replacing X with Y" where it would make no substantive difference which
order those amendments occurred, as long as they all did occur.
A malformed proposal amounting to "Repeal all or most rules" would be
pretty much guaranteed to make a substantive difference, in which case
this clause would remain silent, and the next paragraph of R105 would
still negate it due to ambiguity.]
I vote as follows:
9338: FOR
9339: PRESENT
9340: PRESENT [I think this is also a good solution but I prefer 9341]
9341: FOR
--
Cosmo
Promotor, Illuminator
