On 1/31/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:The intent was to jump
ahead and make more Turns-for-All assignments
to the greatest extent possible.  As things currently stand, and even
under your suggested middle ground, the CotC could have done this:

 "CFJ 1607 is assigned to Quazie.
  This is a Notice of Rotation, pointing out CFJ 1600.
  CFJ 1608 is assigned to Quazie.
  This is a Notice of Rotation, pointing out CFJ 1600.
  CFJ 1609 is assigned to Quazie."

For the love of agora, please don't do that.

Reply via email to