Goethe wrote:
I call for judgement on the following statement, barring Goethe,
OscarMeyr, and Zefram:
But you didn't bar the Pineapple Partnership! Will the PP's
eligibility to judge block Rotation, etc.? I think "our" way
is a little safer... if a judge of a PP-called CFJ says that
PP isn't a person, then the CFJ and eir opinion has no legal effect,
but is probably a suitable-enough "guide" for interpretation that
it would close the matter.
You're right, I probably should have done that.
Proto-proto: Partnerships are ineligible to judge a CFJ if all its
members are ineligible. If some but not all members are ineligible,
then the judgment must be supported by at least one eligible member
to be effective.
