Eris wrote:
On 3/9/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quazie wrote:
> This is exactly the type of change I was talking about, I just have
> never understood the CFJ system enough to write it myself.
Eris, may I publish that short list of bullet points you sent me
about a conceptual revamping of the judiciary?
Err... it's just a summary of a larger list of items. Sure, you can
publish it, and if someone is interested in implementing it, please
get a hold of me so we can discuss the full list.
* standing court
* issue joinder
* requirement for clear and concise pleading
* judicial discretion
* reasonable appeals
* motion to reconsider
* precedent
* declaratory judgement
