Attempt at cleaning up the Excess CFJ rule. I've used the following
as a basis for this change
1. The use of 'dismiss' is unclear, due to DISMISS being a valid
judgement for a CFJ, but dismissal through a CFJ being an
Excess CFJ should be different to dismissal under rule 1565
2. My guess that the Excess CFJ rule is to avoid overloading the
judicial system, so if there are the resources to judge the
Excess CFJs, then they should be judged.
Comments welcome. I'm sure some wording could be improved :)
Replace the entire text of rule 2132 with the following text:
A CFJ submitted by a person who has previously submitted
five or more CFJs during the same Agoran Week as that CFJ
is an Excess CFJ.
An Excess CFJ may be Refused, Deferred or Accepted at
The Clerk of the Courts discretion.
If Refused the Excess CFJ shall be treated as if it had
never been submitted.
If Deferred the Excess CFJ shall be treated as if it had
been submitted, by the same person, at the beginning of the
following Agoran week.
If Accepted the Excess CFJ shall no longer be considered
an Excess CFJ.
The Clerk of the Courts Refuses or Defers the Excess CFJ
by announcement.
The Clerk of the Courts indicates acceptance of an Excess
CFJ by assigning a judge to that CFJ.
