Michael Slone wrote: >Uh... These should all pretty clearly be DISMISSED as irrelevant to >the rules. Or did we get rid of that?
Actually as I read R1565 is doesn't *require* a judgement of DISMISSED, but merely *permits* it in this sort of case. I suggest that the calling of these CFJs forms some sort of evidence for a judgement of TRUE in CFJ 1630. -zefram
