Eep, here's another message with datestamps crossing midnight. (I just CFJed about this concerning Quazie's VC spending.) Headers:
>Received: from yzma.clarkk.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by yzma.clarkk.net (Postfix) with ESMTP > id C2BBC8067E; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 19:00:03 -0500 (CDT) >Received: from ms-smtp-01.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-01.socal.rr.com >[66.75.162.133]) > by yzma.clarkk.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C438067C > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:59:22 -0500 (CDT) >Received: from [192.168.0.11] (cpe-67-49-10-68.socal.res.rr.com [67.49.10.68]) > by ms-smtp-01.socal.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3TNxJsQ010559 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:59:21 -0700 (PDT) >Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:59:19 -0700 It would appear that at the instant of midnight this message was at the listserver, having been received but not yet sent to the output queue for distribution. Another CFJ will probably be required to sort out which week its proposal was submitted in. I won't CFJ on that yet; I'd like to see how my earlier CFJ on Quazie's message is judged. >I remove "Proposal Racket" from the pool. It was titled "Protection Racket", the same title that you used for the new version. This probably wasn't effective in removing the old one. > An Oligarch may refuse a CFJ by announcement. A refused CFJ > ceases to be a CFJ. There is particular concern about this provision, so I'm disappointed to see you retaining it in the second iteration. Swann's Mousetrap Thesis, worth rereading at times like this, points out that the conspirators there could have reserved judging duties for themselves, but refrained from doing so because it would have greatly inflamed the crisis. -zefram
