Maud wrote:
On 5/6/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Upon the adoption of this proposal, the Speaker and Clerk of the Courts
are changed to standing; all other players are changed to lying down.
What is the purpose of this provision of the proposal?
Orientations need to be reinitialized somehow, as the values have
changed. Since the intent of this proposal is to change judging
from opt-out to opt-in, this reinitializes orientations such that
most players start out not yet opted-in. The Speaker and CotC
were made exceptions because they have historically been most
closely tied to the judicial process (CotC for obvious reasons,
also both of them are selected for Boards of Appeal by default).
