On Wednesday 23 May 2007 7:00 pm, Zefram wrote: > Murphy didn't pseudo-judge CFJ 1668
Actually, e did. It was just hiding in the arguments. > I interpret the status of a partnership in the face of changes to the > agreement's membership (and/or text, for that matter) as covered by > Rule 1586 (Definition and Continuity of Entities), and thus pseudo-judge > CFJ 1668 false. >
pgpLiLsUBIy0w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
