Zefram wrote:

comex wrote:
                              If there are complications, Zefram did
not mention them when calling this CFJ.

The only complication is that at the time GreyKnight believed that e could
not legally assign a judge to those CFJs.  Per CFJ 1604 e was mistaken,
but of course that judgement didn't exist then.

We used to have a rule preventing punishment if the player reasonably
believed eir (in)action wasn't a violation.  We might want to revisit
that concept (preferably after "Judicial Cleanup" is applied).

Reply via email to