Goethe wrote:
root wrote:
Ack! The whole point of CFJ 1684 was to settle the matter of CFJs
1622 and 1623 while avoiding the paradoxes introduced in those earlier
CFJs.
I was wondering when someone would notice this.
So was I.
However, if HP2 did
not become Speaker, Murphy is still Speaker. Lucky fact. The CotC can
assign justices twice (or just write "Murphy or HP2" in the assignment
line) and Murphy post judgement twice (or just sign one post behalf of
emself as well as on behalf of HP2,
That was my intent.
and hopefully use restraint and not set up a paradox :) ).
We've had plenty enough paradoxes on this one already, thankyouverymuch.
Issue solved...unless of course the third,
necessarily random Appellate judge is not human.
Only when an Appellate judge is recused do the rules require
random selection.
