Zefram wrote:
Ian Kelly wrote:
It would be good to have R2117 subsumed into deputation as well, but
that's a more complex change.
Yes, it seems odd to me that we have such a different procedure for that.
R2117 was one of the specific instances from which deputation was
generalized; the other was the ADoP's role in Speaker transitions,
back around late 2005 / early 2006.
What about agreements that lack timing requirements?
Would there be any problem with a rule stating "any time the rules
require X, but there would otherwise be no time limit, then the
time limit is ASAP"?
