Eris wrote:
On 7/27/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:a) Should Rule 754 (3)'s "primarily used in ... legal contexts" be interpreted as "primarily used by Agora in legal contexts", or "primarily used by the English-speaking population in general in legal contexts"? In the former case, Rule 754 (3) applies; in the latter, it does not.This is somewhat time-reversed analysis. "person" was "human" until Zefram decided that maybe legal "persons" might be allowed.
Are you going to be the one to tell Blob that?
