Re: DIS: proto: define "notwithstanding"

[Pavitra]

The problem is that I'm not sure whether rule 1030 recognizes
"notwithstanding" as a valid means of claiming precedence. I'd rather
patch the ruleset than invoke a CFJ, as I'm not fully certain what
would happen if the wording was ruled ineffective.
Perhaps there's a more plain-spoken way to accomplish the same thing?